NEONATAL RESEARCH
  • Home
    • History of Neonatal Medicine & Research
    • Clinical Neonatology in Newcastle
  • Biobank
  • Research
    • Trials & studies
    • NEC & microbiome
    • Infant movements
    • Qualitative studies
    • PhD MD and Master students
    • SERVIS study
  • TALKS/TEACHING
    • Video lectures
    • Starting & feed intolerance
    • Nutrition Brain Development
    • Nutritional status & Gut health (Astarte)
    • Start Increase CAPGHAN
    • Risk Benefits PN
    • Nutrition - Late Moderate Preterm
    • Hydrolysed protein jENS
    • Probiotics jENS 2019
    • EBNEO BAPM breakfast club
    • 10 key concepts Preterm Nutrition
    • Donor milk ESPGHAN
    • Nutrition Assessment
    • Gut Brain Axes
    • Butterfly BA
    • Teaching links
    • Executive function in preterm infants
    • Energy ESPGHAN guidelines
    • Gut health
    • Butterfly project
    • Post-discharge nutrition
    • Growth of preterm infant
    • Early Nutrition Later Outcomes
    • How to study Microbiome
    • Nutrition & brain high risk
    • Breast milk fortification
    • Feeding Strategies
    • Gut & immune function
    • Personalised nutrition China
    • UNICEF Microbiome talk
    • Protein requirements - Miami
    • NEC & Gut - Miami
    • Parents & Butterfly
    • Breast is best
    • Microbes Nutrients
    • Microbiome 2017
    • Dysbiosis 2017
    • Butterfly Twin Loss
    • Start & Increase feeds
    • DOHaD
    • PN optimal composition
    • Microbiome & autoimmune
    • NEC due to CMP allergy
    • Early nutrition
    • Bone disease & fortifiers
    • Nutritional premature infants
    • Breastmilk ward 35 update
    • Breast feeding
  • Butterfly project
  • neonatal nutrition network

Re-feeding gastric residuals in extremely preterm infants - we still don't know the answer

5/12/2015

1 Comment

 
The question of when to re-feed gastric residuals (and when to stop feeds on the basis of a large residual) occurs on a daily basis in most large NICUs. The evidence base for the practice is limited but has been reviewed in a recent post from EBNEO Mikael Norman (Professor of Neonatal Medicine at the Karolinska Institute & University Hospital, Sweden) reviewing this recent article in Archives Disease and Childhood (Salas AA, Cuna A, Bhat R, Mcgwin G, Carlo WA, Ambalavanan N. A randomised trial of re-feeding gastric residuals in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(3):F224-8. PMID 25552280).

You can read the full review here https://ebneo.org/category/reviews/

In summary (and apologies for any paraphrasing) Prof Norman says.... there is no evidence from clinical trials to support either approach (not/re-feeding), especially in the high-risk (for both NEC and undernutrition) group of extremely preterm infants.

Salas et al is to be congratulated .........but for the primary question “Does re-feeding of gastric residual volumes reduce the time needed to achieve full enteral feeding in preterm infants?”, the authors conclude that the answer is no. However, although intention to treat analysis was intended, the primary efficacy end point was only possible to assess in 59 infants, as the estimated sample size (n=72) was not reached. Therefore, there are two possibilities: Either the study may have been under-powered ....... or, the results rightly disprove the hypothesis for an effect size of 2 days difference or more to achieve full feeds.

In addition .... numbers were too small to draw any firm conclusions about safety. Information on the volumes of gastric residuals in the two treatment arms was also lacking......  Finally, donor milk was not offered, possibly contributing to quite high rates reported of intestinal perforation, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis, or death. [Although on this point I'd need to say that the data on whether donor human milk is definitely better when used to supplement mother's own milk is also based on scant evidence]

Norman agrees with the conclusion that re-feeding gastric residual volumes in extremely preterm infants does not seem to reduce time to achieve full enteral feeding, and is likely to be safeBut as always ....further evidence is needed





1 Comment
Tom
5/12/2015 03:54:06 pm

To me gastric residual/content should be a good reflection of what the small bowel is doing. The must be a neuroendocrine marker present that represents normal gut peristalsis or even just testing stomach content for bile acids/pancreatase for retrograde flow could be more sensitive.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Nick Embleton is a neonatologist from Newcastle UK.

    Archives

    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

The Neonatal Research Network @www.neonatalresearch.net  - improving care, improving quality. Dedicated to promoting neonatal research and improving outcomes for sick and preterm infants, and their parents.

Research, Trials, Parents, Movement, Nutrition topics, Breast feeding, Blog

Disclaimer. This website is independently owned and operated and is not affiliated to any specific institution. Opinions expressed are our individual ones and not those of our employers or the professional organisations with which we work and collaborate. Some of the photos we have used were taken from the internet - if they belong to you and want them removed just drop us a line. In some of our presentations we may have used diagrams, photos or figures from other peoples work; in addition many of our ideas build on those from others. If you think we used your figures or ideas without referencing you appropriately just drop us a line.  No copyright infringement intended. We are here to spread the word and collaborate. Everything we know in some way builds on the work of others. Thanks!